Banner

 

SAVE THE DATE! - You don't want to miss this event

OAITA's 5th Annual Convention - August 13, 2012

Click here for more information and early bird pricing!

 

Register/Login



What makes an Independent Title Agent Better?


Download the Whitepaper by clicking here

Facebook Image
Twitter Image

Polls

Do you think it is a conflict of interest to permit a real estate firm, mortgage company or bank to engage in the business of title insurance?
 
Banner
Banner

Recent News

Call to Action! - NAILTA Opposes HR 4323 the Consumer Mortgage Choice Act
04/27/2012

There are serious efforts underway in Washington DC to give controlled business arrangements a "leg up" on your business. The House Financial Services Committee (HFSC) in Washington DC is considering a bill known as HR 4323, the Consumer Mortgage Choice Act (click here) which would exempt affiliated businesses from the definition of "points and fees" under Dodd-Frank's qualified mortgage definition. In this way, the bill aims to incentivize the use of affiliated businesses to the detriment of independent title agents. RESPRO, NAR, NAMB and the rest of the referral source lobby want to pass [ ... ]


Legislative UpdatesOhio’s Trust Code Changes - Effective March 22, 2012
03/07/2012

Generally speaking, a trust is not a legal entity and it may not hold title to real property, with a couple of exceptions for specific types of trusts.  Rather, it is the trustee who holds title  [ ... ]


Legislative UpdatesHelp Stop Referral Sources from Exempting AfBAs Under Dodd-Frank
12/06/2011

The referral source lobby is making a last minute attempt to try to amend Dodd-Frank to exempt “affiliates” or controlled business arrangements from the 3% cap rule under Dodd-Frank.  Legislation [ ... ]


Legislative UpdatesODI Lawsuit Update
03/23/2011

The litigation with the Ohio Department of Insurance remains pending in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.  The Magistrate in that action has ruled in favor of permitting OAITA and Eagle Land [ ... ]


CFPB seeks more comment on another version of HUD
Wednesday, 14 December 2011 13:47

 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is asking for more feedback from their recently introduced two new HUD-1 Settlement Statement forms at their website by click here.

 

The two prototypes they used last month displayed the final loan terms in the same format as the prototype for the disclosure consumers would receive a few days after application. This way, people could easily compare their offered and final loan terms. However, the two prototypes displayed a different set of information, the closing costs, in a format similar to the HUD-1 settlement statement that’s currently in use for closing. They have reworked it, based on thousands of your comments.

This month, they are trying something new. They are testing a design that displays the final closing costs in a format similar to the prototype they have been testing for the application disclosures. Their goal this time around is to find out which is better for disclosing closing costs: a design that mirrors the disclosure people receive when they apply for a mortgage, or one that is similar to the current HUD-1 settlement statement.

This is a question they can’t answer for ourselves. The people they need to hear from are consumers, lenders, and settlement agents. In other words: they need to hear from the people who have to use these disclosures.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires them to integrate the two disclosures you currently receive when you close on a mortgage loan: the HUD-1 Settlement Statement and final Truth-In-Lending disclosure. Their goal is to make this one combined form that is easier for both consumers and industry to understand and use. Keep in mind that this is the final disclosure consumers receive either shortly before or at closing. It provides borrowers with the important information like the loan terms, closing costs, and requirements for the loan.

 

 

OAITA Supported By

Banner

OAITA Supported By

Banner

OAITA Supported By

Banner